One of my questions about study on Universal Mid-Life Crisis seems is a little satisfied. I'd asked why economists were performing the study. What I meant by that was why economists and not psychologists, since it seems to be about a relatively "soft" topic of subjective states, as opposed to "hard" definable topics like numbers.
The study looks like it was done at the NBER via their
Here are some handy links:
http://www.nber.org/programs/ag/ - Great synopsis, state of the state-type overview of economics and aging in the "Program Report" on this page.
Also, you can sign up to receive a free email copy of the quarterly Bulletin on Aging and Health here
You can view the latest copies of the Bulletin here.
Finally, you can request a CD of 3 years' worth of related studies here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment away! I love discourse!