This article from the New York Times (linked here in the mobile version, which has less banner ads, etc), does a pretty decent job of going over some of the high-level pros and cons of these "Money Follows the Person" programs.
Some main points:
- PRO: people are thrilled, thrilled, thrilled to escape having their final days in a nursing home
- PRO: it looks like people moving out of nursing homes costs less money
- CON: the "less money" part is most likely due to family members doing labor that is paid for in nursing homes. The article implies that this is a problem, or at least potential hardship for family members, but doesn't delineate that most of the burden of care falls on... you guessed it... women.
Finally, the article mentions:
A recent study by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, found that home care costs taxpayers $44,000 a year less than a nursing home stay - though this number cannot be used to estimate total savings, because often home-based services replace family care, not nursing home care.
I'd bet that Carroll Estes is somehow related to that study!
(the article noted in this post is "Helping Elderly Leave Nursing Homes for a Home" by John Leland)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment away! I love discourse!